Today would have been the 108th birthday of Norman Borlaug.
"Norman who?," some of you might ask, which is a shame and a harsh indictment of our educational system.
Borlaug was an agronomist whose pioneering work in cross-breeding (aka genetically modifying) wheat and agricultural practices has been demarcated as the start of the Green Revolution that has saved a billion people across the globe from starvation. His innovations produced disease-resistant plants, doubled or tripled crop yields per acre, and saved millions of acres from deforestation and being turned into relatively ecologically barren farmland.
His work put the lie to the Malthusian doomsayings of such as Paul Ehrlich, Garrett Hardin, and of course, Malthus himself, as well as mooting the eugenic proclivities of many Best-and-Brightest social-engineering types of yore, including George Bernard Shaw, Havelock Ellis, H. G. Wells, Louis Brandeis and Oliver Wendell “Three generations of imbeciles are enough” Holmes, Jr..
Borlaug's achievements did not go unnoticed. He was awarded:
The Nobel Peace Prize
The Presidential Medal of Freedom
The Public Welfare Medal
The National Medal of Science
The Congressional Gold Medal
And more than 50 honorary degrees. A statue of him stands in the National Statuary Hall of the United States Congress.
Oh, and he has been inducted into the collegiate National Wrestling Hall of Fame.
He serves as shining proof that human innovation can overcome what too many deem insurmountable challenges, in a manner that benefits and improves lives rather than restricting or ignoring them.
Nevertheless, he has his share of critics. Some decry that his work benefited big business over small farmers. Some argue that his work reduced biodiversity and introduced chemicals into the farming industry. Some argue that all he did was forestall the inevitable. Some decry him for normalizing genetic modification of foods.
His innovations were resisted mightily by some environmentalists. This should come as no surprise, given that many environmentalists hate humanity and would shed only crocodile tears at the sorts of mass die-offs that Borlaug's work averted. Which makes them as monstrous as any of the world's worst mass-murdering despots.
Even today, when GMO crops continue to improve the lives of the world's poorest, we witness the continued resistance to the use of Golden Rice, a crop that could save half a million lives a year in south and southeast Asia. That resistance comes, of course, from wealthy first-worlders, who have zero personal risk of famine, malnutrition, or loss of children from such. It's born of ignorance-based fear, of a baseless tendency to regard that which Nature has produced as, well, "natural" in a positive fashion and therefore superior to anything man could create. No matter that virtually everything we eat has been altered by human intervention (hybridizing, cross-breeding, animal husbandry across millennia, followed and enhanced by more scientifically precise gene-editing), and no matter that Mother Nature is more interested in killing us than in kumbaya and dances around the May Pole.
Borlaug didn't demand that humans suffer to "save the planet" (hint: the Earth doesn’t care) He figured out how to save humans - then and there, here and now, not a century in the future. Therein lies a lesson our leaders should heed, and heed well.
Borlaug's name deserves to be known by everyone. A national... nay, a global day of commemoration would be a good start.
If you like this post, please share it far and wide. Scattering seeds is how we sow liberty.
If you like what I write, please subscribe (if you have already, thank you!), and please recommend the blog to your friends! While I share it as much as I can on social media, we all know those get filtered and you're not apt to see all shares.
If you really like The Roots of Liberty and want to help keep it rolling, please consider becoming a paying subscriber here at Substack, or at a lighter level as contributor to the blog via Patreon.
Thank you for your support!
Yours in liberty,
Peter.
So on the one hand saving millions of people every year from the scarcity and high cost of grains is bad, suggesting science should just let people die to reduce the surplus human population as a gift to Gaia. And promote abortion, even to the point in California where the state will now pay for it.
But then the Left insists everyone MUST get masked, vaccinated and boosted to keep people from dying, particularly the old and infirm.
Honestly, COVID presented a huge opportunity for the Left to reduce global populations. And they blew their once-in-a-hundred-years shot.
A billion not dead people can't be wrong