Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeff Mockensturm's avatar

As a hunter (and fisherman), I've often wondered about the constitutionality of game warden conduct, if it's ever been challenged. A game warden can approach any hunter/fisher at any time and perform a "check" - your license, stamps, ID, inspect your firearm, check your ammo, search your person (for "other" ammo or game you might be concealing or other signs of illegal harvesting) based on zero suspicion whatsoever. They "check" everybody - and it's clearly a "fishing expedition" where they're looking for a violation. They show this on TV all the time, if you watch those shows. They'll pull people over on the road and search the vehicle/boat - taking all your (legally) harvested fish/game and laying out on the side of the road looking for any violation - of ANY law, including the finding of illicit narcotics found" incidental" to their search. All conducted with no probable cause whatsoever. Now, I don't "hate" game wardens, I'm just curious under what special suspension of 4th Amendment rules they operate?

Expand full comment
Joe Dunn's avatar

Back the Blue lost a lot of its luster after the pandemic, when LEOs stood aside as rioters burned cities, but sent teams of 3-4 bruisers to arrest lone surfers.

As you pointed out, LEOs can be either respectable and principled people or sociopaths on power trips. But most are just Ordinary Men*, and they'll do what they're told to keep their jobs and put food on the table.

*"Ordinary Men" by Christopher Browning, detailing how average middle-aged Germans became the cold-blooded murderers of tens of thousands of Jews

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts