Discussion about this post

User's avatar
NothingButNet's avatar

👍 Excellent post. The absurdity of the Democratic Party continues to astound me. The self appointed intellectual elites continue to choose the wrong side of every 80/20 issue in front of them. I’ve assumed that it’s simply because they wish to oppose everything Trump does, but so many normal people have left the Democratic Party that it’s entirely possible that the ones who remain and have power simply believe in the 20% side of those 80/20 issues. 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

At this point, the Ivy League elites have become the Poison Ivy elites, leading the party over the cliff to join Thelma and Louise on the canyon floor. While it is fair to point out that there are (and always will be) crazies on the right, the difference is that they have a smaller voice and, more importantly, they have no power to force crazy policies on the Republican Party.

Expand full comment
Jochen Weber's avatar

Last night, I had a call with one of my good friends here in NYC, who pointed your substack out to me some time ago. We talked about the issues for which, even for self-proclaimed heterodox thinkers, likely still Overton windows exist (such as hard to deal with sub-population average differences in IQ scores based on immutable traits). And I came to some sort of interim conclusion: so long as people still fear for their reputation if they were to even mention *having thought* about a topic (forget about what conclusions they draw!), so long will Trump likely keep the upper hand. As status-oriented as his behavior often seems to be, at the very least he clearly demonstrates that he is not afraid thinking and talking about any topic in pretty much any direction (in his, admittedly, hard to sell to intellectuals way). One of the underlying aspects that I strongly suspect voters in all Western countries are now outright rejecting is the notion of “wrong-think.” That a topic would be off-limits prior to having even being given that chance to think it through, and instead being asked to accept an opinion (sex assigned at birth, comes to mind) as fact just *feels* too wrong to people, and they would rather accept a (necessarily!) raging bull in the proverbial china shop than any more politician who is incapable of speaking about truths that are self-evident. Trump discovered the one loophole about human psychology during his stand-up comedy like 2015/2016 campaign that no other politician is willing to touch: just say what everyone knows to be true, no matter how far out of the Overton window it is, and enough people will trust your judgment, even if they will tell pollsters that you are, of course, a morally decrepit person…

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts