Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeff Mockensturm's avatar

The other, and perhaps primary reason for appointing a special counsel, is to shield witnesses from testifying before the House Oversight Committee. With an "ongoing investigation" they can claim - politically, forever - that they can't be compelled to testify before the House. This will force the House to initiate an "impeachment inquiry" which trumps whatever the DOJ is doing. Of course the DOJ will appeal this and I believe only the SCOTUS can settle such a matter.

Expand full comment
David Graf's avatar

While I agree with you on the special counsel, it is at least unseemly for a SC justice to do things which he would not be permitted to do if he was a judge in a lower federal court. Nor should his wife be involved in matters which could come before the court.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts