While surfing YouTube videos the other day, I heard someone offer a Jordan Peterson quote about XformerlyTwitter, and social media in general:
The price of being a prick has fallen to zero.
This reminded me of a bit I wrote four years ago, titled The Tyson Tenet. I’ve appended it, below.
Given that today’s young do not have experience with a world that didn’t have social media, it’s fair to ask how that lack has shaped their style of interacting with the world. In other words, are today’s young more apt to be assholes, because social media has insulated them from the down side of such behavior?
How much harm has society suffered as a result? To what degree are the fractures of today traceable to the corrosive effect of social media on polite discourse?
Originally published at The Roots of Liberty October 2019.
The Tyson Tenet
If you play in the on-line political sandbox, as I do, it’s inevitable that you will be the subject of personal insults, derogations, and impugnments, often decoupled from any actual counterpoint or rebuttal to your comment. The likelihood and quickness of this sort of response increases with the political leaning of the forum in which you’re commenting. Criticize Trump on a Trumpy page, and you’ll hear about it. Criticize socialism on a proggy page, and you’ll hear about it. But, even in forums that align with your opinions, if they’re open to the world, seeing a response of the form,
You’re wrong, obviously, and you’re an idiot.
to even the driest, most impersonal and non-threatening comment is commonplace. That such a response contains nothing of substance does not deter its frequent occurrence. Such do nothing to advance debate, or explore issues, or challenge assertions, or encourage interaction with those of differing viewpoints. They serve no purpose other than petty self-fulfillment and showing off to the like-minded. They are schoolyard and mob behavior, and do harm to the free exchange of ideas and opinions.
I’m a libertarian, and because I post libertarian-leaning opinions and comments, I will have instances of disagreement with both liberals and conservatives. This means that I’ll get abuse from both liberals and conservatives. Now, in my personal experience, I’ve concluded that I’m more likely to see immediate personal attacks from the Left than from the Right, but that’s anecdotal, and while I’d speculate that I’d be correct in asserting that progressives are more likely to attack in this fashion, I will allow the possibility that it’s because I tend to focus on matters economic and big-government in my cyber-travels, where there’s more chance of commonality with the Right and therefore less impetus for them to call me names in response. But, when I’ve delved into immigration or drug-war politics or other topics where I diverge from conservative positions, I have received those same snipes.
No matter the source, though, name-calling accomplishes nothing constructive. It can be cathartic, of course, especially after a long argument where your counterpart descends into assholery, and it can be warranted in such circumstances (when the other guy violates the social compact, you’re not obligated to remain in-bounds), but out-of-the-box insults aimed at a total stranger are nothing more than peacocking for those who already think as you do.
They’re also the product of the physical and temporal separation offered by the Internet. Mike Tyson once observed that:
Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.
The lack of fear of getting punched in the mouth prompts people to “muscle up,” just as they feel safe at raging at others when safely cocooned in the steel and glass of their cars (see: Internet muscles).
So, in the name of promoting a return to a degree of decorum that would advance the free exchange of ideas and opinions, I offer:
The Tyson Tenet:
Write every internet comment as if you are talking, by yourself, face-to-face, to Mike Tyson.
I’ve heard many interviews with a later-in-life Mike Tyson, and he is, by any measure, affable, honest, and extremely funny. And, I expect, he’s more reserved and tolerant than one might assume, given the antics of his youth. But, even at 53 years old, he is still Mike Tyson, and even if he hasn’t done a whit of exercise in a decade, I guarantee he remembers how to throw hands. If you’re unwilling to call him an asshole to his face for no reason other than to show off or make yourself feel superior, you’ve no business doing so to a stranger on the Internet.
Of course, I’m spitting in the wind. Base behavior such as this won’t go away, and its crowding-out of reasoned discourse has already done its damage. Many news and opinion sites have restricted or eliminated their comments sections, and many people don’t even bother engaging in public dialogue any more. That’s a loss that we should all lament.
It's an unfortunate fact, but the younger generations, who've teethed on social media, are not prone to thoughtful intellectual dialogue. Meme-deep, personal insults and "peacocking" (as you describe) are not a substitute for research, historical context and the advancement of ones' ideas. And yet they "demand" the same respect you do (as if one can "demand" respect!).
An anecdote: I left facebook after my then 21-year old niece - a certifiable example of her generation - attacked my neighbor over a thoughtful 2nd Amendment comment he'd made in response to something I'd posted regarding the "militia trope" that Dems have propagated for decades - smitten utterly and completely by the Supreme Court Hobbes decision. She advised him (my neighbor) and me, that we "needed to do a little research" on the subject. My neighbor was then a sitting judge and a licensed, practicing attorney of 25 years, while I'd served a full 30 year career as an officer in the Army. And my niece's expertise? Zero - her "research" apparently didn't include the Hobbes decision at all, and merely parroted progressive "talking points" that substitute for "research" among that generation. Where's the purpose in having a "debate" with someone like that?
Absolutely loved this. The anonymity afforded by social media has created entire classes of boors