I read the first few paragraphs. Grand conspiracies involving hundreds of players fail to convince me because of the basic fact that people cannot shut up, that three can keep a secret if two are dead.
It's just post-hoc pattern seeking by a disturbed mind, from what I see.
"Not impossible that it's true" is a very low bar, lower than we should set. The question should be "does the evidence presented support the assertion above simpler ones?"
It certainly doesn’t meet the Occam’s razor standard. But after the Russian Collusion Hoax (and climate change hoax that is ongoing and also multiple parties involved - I feel this is plausible
The guy who set himself on fire - recommend you read his manifesto which is on substack. It is a conspiracy theory but one that is possibly true.
Rather than make me search, can you share the theory?
How do I send it to you ? I made it a pdf before it disappeared
Oh, not the whole manifesto, just tell me what the conspiracy theory is.
It’s a lot of pages. I will re find it as I did save it but I can’t summarize it. It’s not stupid and it’s not impossible that it’s true
https://theponzipapers.substack.com/p/i-have-set-myself-on-fire-outside
I read the first few paragraphs. Grand conspiracies involving hundreds of players fail to convince me because of the basic fact that people cannot shut up, that three can keep a secret if two are dead.
It's just post-hoc pattern seeking by a disturbed mind, from what I see.
"Not impossible that it's true" is a very low bar, lower than we should set. The question should be "does the evidence presented support the assertion above simpler ones?"
It certainly doesn’t meet the Occam’s razor standard. But after the Russian Collusion Hoax (and climate change hoax that is ongoing and also multiple parties involved - I feel this is plausible
Just sent you the link. It’s below.
That’s a very good, excellent, exceptional column!